Targhee Pass Environmental Assessment

FAQS

Why is the study being done?

The U.S. 20 Corridor Plan has identified a need for safety improvements, pavement restoration, and wildlife-vehicle collision improvements within the Targhee Pass area.

ITD is now initiating an EA to evaluate risks, benefits, opportunities and costs associated with reconstruction of Targhee Pass (U.S. 20 between its junction with Idaho 87 and the Montana state line). The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the lead agency on this study and will be signing the final study document. This study will be completed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

↑ Back To Top

What has been done up to this point?

Since 2004, ITD has engaged in an extensive safety corridor planning effort for U.S. 20 from Chester to the Montana state line – Idaho’s gateway to Yellowstone National Park. The U.S. 20 Corridor Plan is a long-range planning effort examining land uses, existing infrastructure, traffic, and environmental conditions along U.S. 20. ITD has been working with the IDFG as the state's wildlife specialist, per a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and the Henry’s Fork Legacy Project throughout this process. The purpose of the plan is to assess the condition of the U.S. 20 corridor and to identify the necessary improvements to meet the corridor’s system and user needs for the next 20 years.

Please visit the U.S. 20 Corridor Plan Story Map for additional information.

↑ Back To Top

Why this project? Why now?

ITD is proposing transportation improvements for U.S. 20 from Idaho 87 to the Montana state line (Targhee Pass).

As described in the corridor plan, U.S. 20 must accommodate local traffic, heavy tourist traffic, and the majority of the truck freight moved between West Yellowstone, southern Montana, and the communities of the Snake River Plain. When the corridor plan was first being developed, much of the roadway within Idaho was falling behind in serving its function as a component of the National Highway System (NHS). U.S. 20 within Idaho remained a two-lane rural highway, with four-to six-foot-wide shoulders along the majority of its length. Since that time, improvements have been made for many of the segments of the corridor, with Targhee Pass being one of the remaining sections to receive attention. At the present time, pavement condition in this segment of the corridor is beyond routine repair and requires reconstruction as well as consideration of upgrades to meet current design safety standards.

In October 2016, the ITD board approved use of federal funds for making improvements to this segment of the corridor.

↑ Back To Top

I am concerned about wildlife along this section of U.S.-20. How will this be addressed in this process?

Wildlife collisions are a known issue, examined in the corridor planning effort and corridor wildlife studies. ITD has worked closely with Dr. Patty Cramer, an independent wildlife researcher, to collect data and compile a wildlife study as part of the U.S. 20 planning effort. Our study team has also spent the past several months having one-on-one conversations with local agencies, municipalities, tribes and other key stakeholders, which has shed even more light on this important issue.

Study data previously gathered through the U.S. 20 safety corridor plan and our ongoing work with area stakeholders is being used for the Targhee Pass Environmental Study. ITD is looking at options for a solution along with funding opportunities to reduce wildlife-vehicle collisions. ITD has an existing MOU with IDFG designating IDFG as the state's wildlife specialist, as per the MOU.

A common comment received in the scoping phase was specific to WVC reduction measures that would decrease wildlife-vehicle collisions and help promote motorist and wildlife safety.

Starting in January 2017, ITD began working with IDFG to develop a Cooperative Agreement under the existing MOU to conduct additional work above and beyond the work already completed by these two agencies in the overall corridor planning and wildlife migration pattern studies. The agreement would lead to additional work by a consultant to evaluate the ITD District 6 Wildlife Study in order to increase the safety along U.S. 20 by identifying and implementing measures to reduce the WVC rate and provide for wildlife connectivity throughout the corridor.

↑ Back To Top

How can I participate in the process?

The study team is working through an open process to complete a thorough environmental study that considers and evaluates a range of potential solutions.

We are publicizing this effort through traditional, electronic and social media, while working diligently to provide multiple ways for the public to comment. We welcome any comments and discussion through the following avenues:

Phone: 208-220-5937
Email: targheepass@langdongroupinc.com

↑ Back To Top

What is an Environmental Assessment?

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process begins when a federal agency develops a proposal to take a major federal action or (as in this case) when federal funds would be utilized to implement a project. By deciding to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA), ITD and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) will be evaluating whether the proposed action or other alternatives would cause significant environmental effects. If the effects are determined to be less than significant (including avoidance and mitigation measures), then a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) will be prepared and an action alternative will be selected for implementation. Generally, the EA includes a brief discussion of:

  • The need for the proposal
  • Alternatives (when there is an unresolved conflict concerning alternative uses of available resources)
  • The environmental impacts of the proposed action and alternatives
  • A listing of agencies and persons consulted

When completed, the EA document will be made available to the public, and a public meeting will be scheduled and advertised.

↑ Back To Top

What is the Environmental Study considering?

There are several factors driving this effort and being taken into account as part of this study. They include, but are not limited to:

  • Environmental/Wetland Concerns
  • Historic/Architectural features
  • Pavement Conditions
  • Recreation Travel
  • Driver Safety
  • Reducing Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions
  • Area Residences and Businesses
  • Highway Geometry

↑ Back To Top